Al-Dulaym
A grouping reported in the Euphrates country of al-ʿIrāq, about al-Anbār and Hīt, and reported as attached to Zubayd. A historical tribe recorded here by name: the classical works this reference cites do not document it.
- Reported country
- The Euphrates country of al-ʿIrāq, about al-Anbār and Hīt
- Reported attachment
- Zubayd, as commonly reported
- Written
- الدليم, commonly vowelled al-Dulaym
- In the classical works
- Not documented; the name is recorded here, not a descent
- Scope
- Historical — no modern attribution
Overview
Al-Dulaym — written الدليم, commonly vowelled al-Dulaym — is reported as a grouping of the Euphrates country of al-ʿIrāq, in the district of al-Anbār and Hīt and the steppe behind them. Reports attach it to Zubayd, and Zubayd is an old name that the classical genealogists do record; but the attachment of this grouping to it is itself a report of much later date, and the page gives it as a report and not as a fact. It describes a historical tribe as reported, and makes no claim about any modern family.
The name
Ibn Manẓūr enters the root d-l-m for deep blackness: al-adlam is said of a man, of a mountain and of a rock that is intensely dark, and dulaym has the shape of a diminutive built on it. Yāqūt's dictionary of places gives al-Anbār and Hīt on the Euphrates, and describes their country; the lexicon explains the word and the place-book locates the places, and neither of them mentions this grouping or explains why a people came to be called by the name.
On sources
The classical works this reference cites — Ibn Ḥazm, al-Qalqashandī, al-Hamdānī, Yāqūt, Ibn Manẓūr and Ibn Khaldūn — do not document al-Dulaym. Its present shape is later than all of them by centuries, and what is reported about it comes from oral tradition and from later writing that lies outside the sources this reference is permitted to use. The page therefore records the name, the country it is reported in, and what the reports attach it to. It does not record a descent, and nothing on it should be read as one. The page keeps to the name and to what the classical works do and do not contain, and does not enter later history.
On lineage
Branch lists and affiliations here are given as reported, and the genealogists differ among themselves. Nothing on this page establishes any living family's descent: a shared name may reflect descent, alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and the sources usually say which only when they know.
Frequently asked questions
Do the classical genealogists record al-Dulaym?
No. The works this reference cites are all earlier than the grouping's present shape, and none of them mentions it. What is reported of it comes from later and oral tradition.
Does the reported attachment to Zubayd establish a descent?
No. Zubayd is documented in the classical works, but the attachment of this grouping to it is a later report. A reported attachment is not a proved descent, and this page does not turn one into the other.
Sources
- ابن منظور، لسان العرب، 711هـ — مادّة دلم — المذكور اللفظ، لا هذه الجماعة
- ياقوت الحموي، معجم البلدان، 626هـ — في الأنبار وهيت — المذكور الموضع، لا القبيلة
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07