Banū Maʿqil
The Arab group that Ibn Khaldūn treats at greatest length among those that moved furthest west and south, into the far Maghrib and the desert beyond it. He reports their descent as disputed, and does not settle it.
- Reported descent
- Disputed in Ibn Khaldūn's own account — traced by some to Hilāl, and by the account he prefers to Madhḥij of the Yemeni side
- Recorded country
- The far Maghrib, the oasis country of the desert road, and the desert beyond, as reported
- Sections named
- Dhawī ʿUbayd Allāh, Dhawī Manṣūr, Dhawī Ḥassān — as reported, and the lists differ
- Fullest source
- Ibn Khaldūn, on the Arab groups of the Maghrib
- Scope
- Historical — no modern attribution
Overview
Banū Maʿqil are recorded entering North Africa with the Arab movement west of the fifth century AH, and Ibn Khaldūn gives them more space than any other group in that movement apart from the Hilālī branches themselves. What sets his account apart is the country: where Riyāḥ and Zughba are placed in Ifrīqiya and the central Maghrib, Maʿqil are carried to the far Maghrib and to the desert edge south of it, along the roads through the oases and the wadis that run toward the Sahara. This page describes a historical tribe and makes no claim about any modern family.
A descent the sources do not agree on
Ibn Khaldūn is explicit that the descent of Maʿqil was disputed in his own day. He reports that some traced them to Hilāl, because they travelled with the Hilālī branches and were counted among them by the people of the country, and that the account he prefers reckons them instead to the Yemeni side, to Madhḥij — as reported, and reported with variants he does not resolve. This is a useful case to hold in mind: a well-attested classical source, writing about a group he knew a great deal about, records that the genealogy was already contested. Where the sources do not settle a descent, this reference does not settle it for them.
Recorded country and branches
The sections named under Maʿqil in his account include Dhawī ʿUbayd Allāh, Dhawī Manṣūr and Dhawī Ḥassān, the last of which is treated on its own page here — and the lists differ, with a name given as a son in one telling appearing lower down in another. Their country is given as the southern and western marches: the oasis country on the desert road, the valleys draining southwest from the mountains, and the open desert beyond, where the reports place them holding the caravan routes rather than the settled land. Because that country is desert, the sections are described as moving over long distances, and a report that places a section in one district does not fix it there.
The name
Ibn Manẓūr enters the root ʿ-q-l for binding and for the mind, and gives al-maʿqil for a refuge or a stronghold — the place a man withdraws to and is protected in. Maʿqil is also an ordinary personal name in the classical books, borne by men of several tribes, so its occurrence in a text is not by itself a reference to this group. The lexicon explains the word; it does not explain why a people came to be called by it.
On lineage
This page describes a historical tribe as the classical sources record it, and makes no claim about any modern family. Branch lists and affiliations are given as reported, and the genealogists differ among themselves. Nothing here establishes any living family's descent: a shared name may reflect descent, alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and the sources usually say which only when they know.
Frequently asked questions
Were Banū Maʿqil part of Banū Hilāl?
The sources do not agree. Ibn Khaldūn reports that some counted them with Hilāl because they travelled with the Hilālī branches, and that the account he prefers reckons them to Madhḥij instead. He does not settle it, and neither does this page.
Does the page attach any family to Banū Maʿqil?
No. It records a historical group as reported. Attaching a living family to a name requires evidence the name by itself does not supply.
Sources
- ابن خلدون، كتاب العبر، 808هـ — في أخبار بني معقل ودخولهم المغرب، وذكر الخلاف في نسبهم
- القلقشندي، نهاية الأرب في معرفة أنساب العرب، 821هـ — في ذكر معقل وما قيل في نسبها
- ابن منظور، لسان العرب، 711هـ — مادّة (ع ق ل) والمَعْقِل — المذكور اللفظ، لا القبيلة
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07