Al-Ḥarīsh
The least documented of the four branches counted from Kaʿb ibn Rabīʿa — a name the lineage lists carry further than the histories do.
- Grouping
- Kaʿb ibn Rabīʿa, under Banū ʿĀmir
- Brother-lines as reported
- Qushayr, ʿUqayl, Jaʿda
- Note
- Held by the lineage lists; little covered by the histories
- Scope
- Historical — no modern attribution
Overview
Al-Ḥarīsh is recorded as a son of Kaʿb ibn Rabīʿa ibn ʿĀmir, and so as a brother-line to Qushayr, ʿUqayl and Jaʿda. Beyond that placement the classical record is thin: the name holds its position in the lineage lists, but the histories and the ayyām literature return to it far less than to its brothers. This page describes a historical tribe and makes no claim about any modern family.
What a thin record means
It is worth saying plainly what such a page can and cannot support. That a branch is briefly noticed is a fact about the sources, not about the people: the compilers wrote most about the groups whose affairs touched Mecca, the caravan routes and the early conquests, and a tribe that stayed in its own country produced fewer reports. A thin record is therefore no argument either for or against any claim of descent — it simply means the material to test such a claim is not there.
The name
The lexicographers give ḥarīsh as the name of a horned beast, and treat the root ḥ-r-sh in the senses of roughness, of scoring a surface, and of ḥarsh al-ḍabb, the technique of drawing a lizard from its burrow by scratching at the mouth of it. They do not agree on which of these the personal name was taken from, and this reference does not choose for them.
On lineage
Branch lists and affiliations here are given as reported by the classical genealogists, who themselves disagree. Nothing on this page establishes any living family's descent: a shared name may reflect descent, alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and the sources usually say which only when they know.
Frequently asked questions
Why is so little recorded about al-Ḥarīsh?
Because the compilers wrote most about groups whose affairs touched Mecca, the caravan routes and the early conquests. A thin record is a fact about the sources, and is no argument for or against any claim of descent.
Sources
- ابن حزم الأندلسي، جمهرة أنساب العرب، 456هـ — أنساب عامر بن صعصعة
- ابن منظور، لسان العرب، 711هـ — مادة (ح ر ش)
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07