Banī Thaʿlaba
A name borne by more than one unrelated group — in Bakr, in Ghaṭafān, and elsewhere; the sources keep them apart.
- Note
- Distinct groups share this name
- Recorded in
- Bakr (Thaʿlaba ibn ʿUkāba); Ghaṭafān (Thaʿlaba ibn Saʿd ibn Dhubyān); other lines
- Name
- From the animal name — the fox
- Scope
- Historical — no modern attribution
Overview
Banū Thaʿlaba is one of the names that is not one tribe, and that is the most useful thing this page can say. The genealogists record a Thaʿlaba ibn ʿUkāba in Bakr ibn Wāʾil, from whom Qays, Shaybān and other well-known sections of Bakr are reckoned; they record a separate Thaʿlaba ibn Saʿd ibn Dhubyān in Ghaṭafān, of the Qaysī side of Muḍar entirely; and the name occurs again in other lines which they keep apart from both. Two groups called Banū Thaʿlaba in two different sources are therefore not evidence of a common ancestor, and a chain that stops at the bare name has not yet said anything.
The reason is not mysterious. Thaʿlaba is built on the familiar animal name — the fox — and naming after animals was among the most productive habits in Arabic onomastics, alongside Asad, Kalb and Dhiʾb; the lexicographers also give the root other, unrelated senses, among them the outlet by which water runs off. A common name arising independently in distant places needs no explanation beyond its commonness.
This page describes historical groupings and makes no claim about any modern family. Where a family today carries a name of this shape, the classical practice itself gives three possible routes to it — descent, alliance or clientage — and the sources say which only when they know.
On lineage
Branch lists and affiliations here are given as reported by the classical genealogists, who themselves disagree. Nothing on this page establishes any living family's descent: a shared name may reflect descent (ṣarīḥ), alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and the sources usually say which only when they know.
Frequently asked questions
Are all Banū Thaʿlaba one tribe?
No. The genealogists record a Thaʿlaba in Bakr, another in Ghaṭafān under Dhubyān, and the name in further lines besides — and they treat them as distinct.
How can two Thaʿlaba lines be told apart?
By the chain around the name rather than the name itself — which grandfather it is traced through, and which grouping the source places it under.
Sources
- ابن حزم الأندلسي، جمهرة أنساب العرب، 456هـ — في أنساب بكر وغطفان
- القلقشندي، نهاية الأرب في معرفة أنساب العرب، 821هـ — في أنساب ربيعة ومضر
- ابن منظور، لسان العرب، 711هـ — مادة ث ع ل ب
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07