al-Namir ibn Qāsiṭ
A Rabīʿa tribe reckoned from Qāsiṭ beside Wāʾil, recorded in the north along the Euphrates, and not to be confused with Banū Numayr.
- Grouping
- Rabīʿa (ʿAdnānī), through Qāsiṭ, as reported
- Stands beside
- Wāʾil, the father of Bakr and Taghlib
- Recorded country
- The Euphrates and al-Jazīra
- Caution
- Not Banū Numayr of ʿĀmir ibn Ṣaʿṣaʿa
Overview
Al-Namir is reckoned al-Namir ibn Qāsiṭ ibn Hinb ibn Afṣā ibn Duʿmiy ibn Jadīla — as reported. The point worth holding onto is where that places it: Qāsiṭ is also given as the father of Wāʾil, to whom Bakr and Taghlib are reckoned, so al-Namir stands beside those two rather than under them. It is a smaller name than either, and the accounts often bring it up in their company.
The country recorded for it lies in the north: the Euphrates and the districts of al-Jazīra above the low irrigated land. Here the classical distinction matters, because it is regularly lost in modern retellings — al-Jazīra is a country of its own in the geographies, and a source placing al-Namir there has not placed it in ʿIrāq.
The name
The lexicographers derive al-namir, the leopard, from its numar, its spots or dapplings, and predator names are among the commonest in Arab naming — Asad the lion beside Namir the leopard. The vowelling of the tribal name is al-Namir, and it is worth keeping in the mind's ear, because the confusion this page mainly exists to prevent is a confusion of names that look and sound close.
Not Banū Numayr
Al-Namir ibn Qāsiṭ is not Banū Numayr. Numayr is reckoned to ʿĀmir ibn Ṣaʿṣaʿa of Hawāzin, on the Qaysī side of the Muḍar line — a different tribe, a different country and a different section of the genealogies, as reported. The nisbas differ too, al-Namarī against al-Numayrī, but the two names sit close enough in sound and in careless copying that retellings merge them. Where an unpointed or unvowelled source names the tribe of al-Namir, or a nisba of that shape, the chain around it has to decide which is meant.
On lineage
This page describes a historical tribe as the classical sources record it, and makes no claim about any modern family. Branch lists and affiliations are given as reported by the genealogists, who themselves disagree. Nothing here establishes any living family's descent: a shared name may reflect descent, alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and the sources usually say which only when they know.
Frequently asked questions
Is al-Namir ibn Qāsiṭ the same as Banū Numayr?
No. Numayr is reckoned to ʿĀmir ibn Ṣaʿṣaʿa of Hawāzin, on the Qaysī side; al-Namir is reckoned to Rabīʿa through Qāsiṭ. The names are close enough in sound and script that retellings merge them.
Is al-Namir a branch of Bakr or Taghlib?
No. All three are reckoned to Qāsiṭ, as reported — Bakr and Taghlib through Wāʾil, al-Namir directly — so it stands beside them.
Sources
- ابن حزم الأندلسي، جمهرة أنساب العرب، 456هـ — أنساب ربيعة
- القلقشندي، نهاية الأرب في معرفة أنساب العرب، 821هـ — باب ربيعة
- ابن منظور، لسان العرب، 711هـ — مادّة نمر
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07