Banū ʿĀmir ibn Ṣaʿṣaʿa
The largest grouping the genealogists place under Hawāzin, and the house to which Kilāb, Kaʿb, Numayr, Sawāʾa and Banū Hilāl are reckoned.
- Grouping
- Hawāzin, under Muḍar (ʿAdnānī)
- Diyār
- The high country of Najd; Ḍariyya reported in a branch's country
- Branches as reported
- Rabīʿa (whence Kilāb and Kaʿb), Hilāl, Numayr, Sawāʾa
- Scope
- Historical — no modern attribution
Overview
ʿĀmir ibn Ṣaʿṣaʿa is the largest of the groupings the genealogists place under Hawāzin, and through Hawāzin under Muḍar in the ʿAdnānī line. Its diyār are given as the high country of Najd, and Yāqūt records the ḥimā of Ḍariyya — the protected pasture on the road from Baṣra to Mecca — in the country of one of its branches. Like Hawāzin above it, the name sits at the level of a gathering rather than a tribe anyone belongs to directly: what the sources record beneath it are the branch names a reader actually meets. This page describes a historical grouping and makes no claim about any modern family.
The branches as reported
Ibn Ḥazm records the sons of ʿĀmir as Rabīʿa, Hilāl, Numayr and Sawāʾa, and places Kilāb and Kaʿb a generation lower as sons of Rabīʿa; from Kaʿb, in turn, are counted Qushayr, ʿUqayl, al-Ḥarīsh and Jaʿda. Other genealogists order the same names differently, and some attach further sections that Ibn Ḥazm does not. The list is a scholarly reconstruction, not a register kept at the time. Of all these, Banū Hilāl is the branch the wider world knows, for the westward migration that became an epic cycle.
In the poetic record
Much of what is remembered about Banū ʿĀmir reached later readers through poetry rather than through genealogy. Ibn Ḥazm names poets among its branches as he goes, Labīd ibn Rabīʿa — whom he reckons to Jaʿfar ibn Kilāb of this house — among them. The distinction is worth keeping in view: a tribe can be prominent in the literature and thin in the record of who actually descended from whom, and fame in the dīwāns is not evidence of anyone's line.
On lineage
Branch lists and affiliations here are given as reported by the classical genealogists, who themselves disagree. Nothing on this page establishes any living family's descent: a shared name may reflect descent, alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and the sources usually say which only when they know.
Frequently asked questions
Is ʿĀmir ibn Ṣaʿṣaʿa a tribe one belongs to today?
In the sources it is a gathering name standing above many branches, like Hawāzin above it. Readers meet the branch names — Kilāb, Kaʿb, Numayr and the rest — far more often than the parent name.
Are Banū Hilāl part of this house?
The genealogists reckon Hilāl among the sons of ʿĀmir, so yes as reported — with the usual caution that the ordering of these names differs from one genealogist to another.
Sources
- ابن حزم الأندلسي، جمهرة أنساب العرب، 456هـ — أنساب هوازن وعامر بن صعصعة
- ياقوت الحموي، معجم البلدان، 626هـ — في ذكر ضريّة وحماها
- القلقشندي، نهاية الأرب في معرفة أنساب العرب، 821هـ — باب هوازن
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07