Banī Asad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿUzzā
A Qurashī clan of Mecca reckoned by the genealogists to Asad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿUzzā ibn Quṣayy — not the separate Muḍarī tribe Asad ibn Khuzayma.
- Grouping
- Quraysh, under Kināna
- Seat
- Mecca
- In the two blocs
- Muṭayyabūn, as reported
- Not to be confused with
- Asad ibn Khuzayma, a separate tribe of Muḍar
- Scope
- Historical — no modern attribution
Overview
The genealogists place this clan among the Quraysh of Mecca and reckon it to Asad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿUzzā ibn Quṣayy ibn Kilāb, which sets it, in their arrangement, beside the lines of ʿAbd Manāf and ʿAbd al-Dār, branching off at the sons of Quṣayy. In the accounts of the two Meccan blocs it is counted among the Muṭayyabūn, and the received version of the ḥilf al-fuḍūl names it among the Qurashī clans party to that pact — an undertaking of mutual support rather than a line of descent, and alliance is one of the recognised ways a tribal name is acquired without birth. The name itself is asad, the lion in the lexicons, and the nisba formed from it is al-Asadī. The most useful thing this page can say is a distinction. Asad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿUzzā of Quraysh is not Asad ibn Khuzayma ibn Mudrika, who is recorded at the head of a large independent tribe of Muḍar, with its own chapter in the genealogies and with territory reported in Najd and around it. The written form is identical and the nisba is identical, al-Asadī, while the ancestor meant is not, so a bare nisba met in a report or a document does not settle which of the two is intended — and the name is borne outside both. This page describes a historical clan and makes no statement about any modern family.
On lineage
Branch lists and affiliations here are given as reported by the classical genealogists, who themselves disagree. Nothing on this page establishes any living family's descent: a shared name may reflect descent, alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and the sources usually say which only when they know.
Frequently asked questions
Are Banī Asad of Quraysh the same as Banū Asad ibn Khuzayma?
No. The genealogists keep them apart: one is a Meccan clan of Quraysh reckoned to Asad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿUzzā, the other a large tribe of Muḍar reckoned to Asad ibn Khuzayma. They share the spelling and the nisba al-Asadī, nothing more.
Does membership of the ḥilf al-fuḍūl imply descent?
No. A ḥilf is a sworn alliance, and the sources record it as such; it is one of the ways a tribal name spreads without birth.
Sources
- ابن حزم الأندلسي، جمهرة أنساب العرب، 456هـ — في أنساب قريش وولد قصي
- القلقشندي، نهاية الأرب في معرفة أنساب العرب، 821هـ — باب قريش
- ابن منظور، لسان العرب، 711هـ — مادة أسد
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07