Al-Ataki
A family name (nisba) to al-ʿAtīk of Azd, strongly associated with ʿUmān and with Baṣra in the early period, and met heavily through clientage.
- Type
- Tribal nisba
- Attributed to
- al-ʿAtīk, of Azd (as reported)
- Root
- ʿ-t-q
- Also met through
- walāʾ, and through Baṣra and Khurāsān
Overview
Al-Ataki (al-ʿAtakī) is the nisba of al-ʿAtīk, a section the genealogists enter under Azd. Its association is with ʿUmān, where Azd settled in strength, and with Baṣra and Khurāsān afterwards: the biographical literature of the early Islamic east is full of the form, and it is there rather than in the Arabian south that most bearers are met. The root ʿ-t-q in Lisān al-ʿArab carries age and precedence — ʿatīq for what is old and choice — and, in its most consequential sense here, ʿitq, the freeing of a slave.
Names easily confused
That last sense is the reason the form must be read carefully. Baṣra was a town where walāʾ was ordinary, and the biographical writers apply al-ʿAtakī to a group's mawālī as freely as to its ṣarīḥ members, without a mark separating them; on its own the nisba does not say which is meant. The root also supplies near neighbours that the written form brings close without joining: al-ʿAtīqī and al-ʿUtaqī rest on ʿatīq and ʿitq directly, and al-ʿĀtikī is built on ʿĀtika, a woman's name borne in more than one house, so it is a different nisba altogether. The vocalizations al-ʿAtakī and al-ʿAtīkī are both met for this name and do not by themselves mark different lines.
Bearing the name
A tribal nisba records what a family is called, not who its ancestors were. It may follow descent (ṣarīḥ), alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and only a family's own documented record tells those apart.
Sources
- ابن حزم الأندلسي، جمهرة أنساب العرب، 456هـ — في العتيك من الأزد؛ يُراجَع ويُوثَّق قبل إثبات التفاصيل
- القلقشندي، نهاية الأرب في معرفة أنساب العرب، 821هـ — في النسبة إلى العتيك
- ابن منظور، لسان العرب، 711هـ — مادة: عتق
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07