Banū al-ʿAtīk
An Azdī section whose nisba al-ʿAtakī fills the biographical literature of Baṣra and Khurāsān.
- Grouping
- Al-Azd (Qaḥṭānī), as reported
- Recorded in
- ʿUmān, then Baṣra and Khurāsān
- Nisba
- al-ʿAtakī — common in the biographical literature
- Name
- Root ʿ-t-k, given more than one sense
- Scope
- Historical — no modern attribution
Overview
al-ʿAtīk is one of the sections the genealogists reckon to al-Azd, named in the Azdī chapters and recorded in ʿUmān and then, after the conquests, in Baṣra and eastward in Khurāsān. Ibn Ḥazm follows houses from it that rose to prominence in those provinces, which is why its nisba is met far more often in histories and biographical dictionaries than in accounts of the desert. This page describes a historical section and makes no claim about any modern family.
The nisba in the books
al-ʿAtakī is among the commonest Azdī nisbas in the biographical literature, and its frequency is a caution rather than a proof. The compilers of those books attached a nisba for several reasons: descent, alliance and clientage all produced the same word, and they added a qualification such as mawlāhum when they knew a man was a client. Where they did not know, they wrote the nisba plain. A page of transmitters carrying al-ʿAtakī therefore records association with the name, and the reasons behind it are not uniform.
The name
The lexicographers refer ʿatīk to the root ʿ-t-k, which they give more than one sense: ʿataka meaning to press on or bear down in an attack, and al-ʿātik used of something reddened, as of a bow darkened with age. They do not choose between these when explaining the name, and neither does this reference.
On lineage
Branch lists and affiliations here are given as reported by the classical genealogists, who themselves disagree. Nothing on this page establishes any living family's descent: a shared name may reflect descent, alliance (ḥilf) or clientage (walāʾ), and the sources usually say which only when they know.
Frequently asked questions
Does al-ʿAtakī in a biographical entry mean descent?
Not necessarily. The compilers used a nisba for descent, alliance and clientage alike, adding mawlāhum only when they knew the man was a client. Plain, it records association with the name.
Sources
- ابن حزم الأندلسي، جمهرة أنساب العرب، 456هـ — في أنساب الأزد وذكر العتيك
- ابن منظور، لسان العرب، 711هـ — مادة (ع ت ك)
- القلقشندي، نهاية الأرب في معرفة أنساب العرب، 821هـ — باب الأزد
This page is an educational, historical reference compiled from published sources. It is not an authority on lineage. Where sources differ, we report the difference without taking a position. Corrections are welcome via our contact page.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-07